ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
The impacts of caring for children with inherited metabolic diseases for families: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren with inherited metabolic diseases (IMDs) often have high care needs that require extensive involvement of family caregivers. This study aimed to describe caregiver experiences, including management of children's needs at home, and the impacts of that management on family time, finances, and caregiver and child health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
methodsIn this sub-study within a larger cohort study, participants were family caregivers of children ≤ 12 years old diagnosed with an IMD, from across Canada. We collected cross-sectional data using an online questionnaire consisting of validated measures and team-developed questions, and analyzed data descriptively.
resultsSeventy-one caregivers participated and reported using a range of supports and interventions to care for their children with IMDs, with dietary supports being most common (77.1%). Twenty-seven participants (45%) reported spending ≥ 4 extra hours per week assisting their child with care supports at home and 28 reported ≥ 6 missed days of work by caregivers in the past year for IMD care. All participants reported fulfillment from caregiving tasks, although 82% reported mental struggles related to caregiving. Based on caregiver reports, children with IMDs had lower HRQoL relative to population normative data. We observed lower median scores for several HRQoL subscales among children with IMDs classified as progressive with multi-system involvement relative to other IMDs.
conclusionWe identified important impacts of IMD care for family caregivers. Relief from high levels of caregiving responsibility and time should be a priority for the development of healthcare policies and interventions, to improve health and well-being for both children and their caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.