ArticleBMC oral health2026
A growth-adjusted digital prosthetic protocol for a child with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: a 5-year longitudinal clinical report.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A four-year-old boy with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (XLHED) presented with complete anodontia, severe esthetic concerns, and functional limitations. The treatment plan aimed to provide both functional restoration and esthetic improvement, utilizing a fully digital workflow. After a comprehensive clinical and radiographic evaluation, digital cast scanning and 3D analysis were used to create a precise virtual plan for the fabrication of a customized complete denture. The initial dentures were followed by regular follow-up visits at 6-month intervals, with the patient returning for adjustments to accommodate his rapid growth. Over a five-year period of follow-up, the child received updated dentures as his facial and oral structures developed. This approach not only restored the boy's masticatory, speech, and esthetic functions but also allowed for continuous adaptation of the prostheses as the child grew. This report contributes to the existing literature by introducing a reproducible, quantitative workflow. Unlike purely descriptive digital denture reports, this protocol integrates a quantitative segmented morphometric analysis into a fully digital workflow to support objective, growth‑oriented clinical decision‑making, particularly in distinguishing between conservative relining and the need for complete prosthesis refabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.