ArticleBMC medical education2026
Developing diagnostic reasoning through point-of-care ultrasound in emergency medicine training: a qualitative study of international medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTechnology-enhanced learning is increasingly applied in medical education to support complex cognitive processes, including diagnostic reasoning. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), as a portable and real-time imaging modality, has been widely integrated into clinical training. However, limited research has explored how learners engage with POCUS to construct diagnostic understanding, particularly within international medical education contexts involving students from resource-variable healthcare environments. This study aimed to investigate international medical students' learning experiences with POCUS as a technology-enhanced learning tool.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted involving 28 third- and fourth-year international medical students who participated in a structured POCUS learning activity. The intervention combined guided instruction with supervised hands-on practice in cardiac and abdominal ultrasound within an emergency medicine training context. Following the activity, participants completed written reflective narratives. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns in learners' experiences and meaning-making processes.
resultsFour major themes were identified. First, POCUS facilitated diagnostic understanding through real-time visualisation of anatomical structures and physiological processes. Second, integration of ultrasound within problem-based clinical scenarios supported the development of diagnostic reasoning. Third, collaborative learning and instructor scaffolding enhanced engagement and knowledge construction. Fourth, participants recognised the limitations of POCUS and highlighted the importance of reflective practice and continued skill development. These findings demonstrate that learners actively integrate visual, experiential, and contextual information when engaging with POCUS.
conclusionPOCUS functions as an effective technology-enhanced learning tool that supports diagnostic reasoning by linking visualisation with contextualised and reflective learning processes. The findings extend current understanding of technology-enhanced medical education by demonstrating how domain-specific technologies facilitate meaning-making and cognitive integration in diverse and cross-cultural learning environments. These insights have implications for the design of ultrasound-based curricula in emergency medicine education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.