ArticleBMC oral health2026
Dental caries prevalence and associated factors among 12-year-old children in Shanghai: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDental caries remains one of the most prevalent chronic diseases among children globally. This study aimed to determine the current prevalence of dental caries and identify key factors associated with caries among 12-year-old children in Shanghai based on a theory-informed analytical framework, to inform targeted prevention strategies.
methodsA school-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2024. A total of 2570 children aged 12 years were selected from 16 districts of Shanghai using a multi-stage, stratified, cluster sampling method. Data were collected through oral clinical examinations performed by calibrated dentists using WHO criteria and a structured questionnaire covering socio-demographics, dietary habits, oral hygiene behaviors, knowledge, attitudes, and dental service utilization. Caries experience was assessed using the DMFT index. Univariate analyses (Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test) were conducted. For multivariable analysis, covariate sets were determined using a directed acyclic graph, and modified Poisson regression with robust variance was employed to estimate prevalence ratios. Cross-tabulation and the Chi-square test were used to analyze the distribution differences in the intake frequency of five major cariogenic foods between genders.
resultsThe overall caries prevalence was 19.65%, with a mean DMFT of 0.41 ± 1.04. Multivariable analysis using modified Poisson regression revealed that lower paternal education level (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.344, P = 0.012), female sex (PR = 1.524), suburban residence (PR = 1.238), and higher frequency of dessert and candy intake were significantly associated with increased caries. Compared with children consuming desserts ≤ 1 time/week, those consuming desserts ≥ 1 time/day had a higher caries prevalence (PR = 1.391, P = 0.003), with a dose-response gradient observed across intake categories. A similar pattern was found for candies (≥ 1 time/day vs. ≤1 time/week: PR = 1.458, P = 0.001). Brushing time and brushing specific surfaces were not significantly associated with caries. Children without fissure sealants had a lower caries prevalence than those with sealants (PR = 0.749, P = 0.001). Higher oral health knowledge was paradoxically associated with higher caries prevalence (PR = 0.735, P = 0.027). Girls had higher intake of solid sweets, while boys consumed more sugary beverages.
conclusionsThe caries prevalence among 12-year-old children in Shanghai is relatively low, yet significant differences exist by sex, region, and socioeconomic factors. Dietary behaviors-particularly frequent dessert and candy intake-were the primary modifiable factors. The inverse association between fissure sealants and caries likely reflects indication bias. The paradoxical knowledge-caries association suggests reverse causality. Bridging the knowledge-behavior gap remains a priority for prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.