ArticleBMC palliative care2026
The impact of municipal healthcare setting on the quality of end-of-life care: a population-based cohort study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Sweden, approximately half of all individuals who die receive municipal care prior to death. Access to high-quality palliative care remains unequal, with known disparities between both care settings and diagnostic groups. Individuals receiving municipal home care are at higher risk of acute hospital admissions and in hospital death than those in long-term care facilities. However, the impact of municipal care setting on the quality of end-of-life care is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of care setting on the quality of end-of-life care among patients receiving municipal healthcare services.
methodThis population-based cohort study included all individuals reported during 2023-2024 in the Swedish Register for Palliative Care as recipients municipal palliative care during the last week of life (n = 50,219). Associations between care setting (ordinary housing, and long- and short-term care facilities) and end-of-life quality indicators were analyzed using modified Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and cause of death.
resultsCompared to individuals receiving care in ordinary housing, those in long- and short-term care were more likely to receive symptom assessments ([RR; 95% CI] 1.14; 1.09-1.19 vs. 1.08; 1.03-1.13). However, they were less likely to receive end-of-life information ([RR; 95% CI] 0.92; 0.91-0.94 vs. 0.98; 0.97-0.99), bereavement support for relatives ([RR; 95% CI] 0.98; 0.97-0.99 vs. 0.95; 0.94-0.96), and external pain consultations ([RR; 95% CI] 0.52; 0.49-0.57 vs. 0.81; 0.76-0.88).
conclusionsCare setting influences the quality of municipal end-of-life care. Strengths and weaknesses vary across settings, highlighting the need for targeted quality improvement efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.