SynthesisBMC public health2026
Prevalence of elder abuse among community-dwelling older adults in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElder abuse is an escalating global concern, jeopardizing public health and human rights while hindering the pursuit of healthy aging. In South Asia, socio-cultural complexities, including patriarchal norms, family-centric caregiving practices, and inadequate institutional support systems exacerbate the problem. Despite global attention, region-specific evidence from South Asia remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the prevalence of community-based elder abuse and sub-types among community-dwelling older adults (≥ 60 years) in South Asia and explored gender differences in abuse experiences.
methodsA comprehensive search across six databases and grey literature identified 1,088 studies. We included studies reporting elder abuse in family or community settings among older adults (≥ 60 years) living in one of the eight South Asian countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Data was extracted using Covidence, and quality assessment was performed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses employed random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic.
resultsAfter data extraction, 33 studies were included, representing five countries: Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Most studies were from India (n = 21) and Nepal (n = 7). The pooled prevalence was 31.83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.06-39.47); prediction interval [PI]: 6.06%-77.16%) and should be interpreted with considerable caution given extreme statistical heterogeneity (I²=99.6%, τ²=0.91). Significant inter-country variability was observed [India (25.81%, I²=99.6%, τ²=1.00), Nepal (49.84%, I²=90%, τ²=0.12), and Sri Lanka (30.57%, I²=99.2%, τ²=0.38)]. Gender differences were evident, with women experiencing higher abuse (prevalence = 33.04%, 95%CI: 23.76-43.87) compared to men (prevalence = 24.33%, 95%CI: 17.26-33.13). Subtype analysis identified caregiver neglect and psychological abuse (both around 20%) as the most prevalent forms, disproportionately affecting women.
conclusionsLimited research on elder abuse in South Asia emphasizes the need for comprehensive studies targeting both country-specific and regional contexts. This study highlights common problem of elder abuse in South Asia, particularly among women, and suggests the need for culturally sensitive and community-based interventions to address elder abuse, promote eldercare, and protect vulnerable populations in the region. Findings from five SAARC countries may not apply to Afghanistan, Bhutan, or the Maldives, where eligible studies on elder abuse were not identified.
trial registrationPROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024512991).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.