ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Patient perspectives on barriers to rTMS for peripartum depression.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeripartum depression (PPD) is often underdiagnosed and left untreated. PPD can negatively impact maternal health and child development and is associated with an increased risk of maternal suicide. Effective and safe treatments that are viewed as acceptable by patients are needed. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory treatment that has the potential to meet this need.
methodsThe objective was to identify the level of awareness of rTMS among participants who experienced depressive symptoms during the peripartum period and to understand the barriers and facilitators that impact access to rTMS. Three focus groups with a total of 9 participants who experienced depressive symptoms during the peripartum period were conducted. A descriptive interpretive thematic analysis was completed.
resultsThe majority of participants (6 out of 9; 67%) never heard of rTMS prior to this study. Following a brief description of rTMS by the researcher, all participants expressed an interest in rTMS and a willingness to learn more about it as a treatment for PPD; however, some expressed reservations about receiving the treatment during pregnancy due to uncertainty regarding whether it could have an impact on their child's well-being. The following four themes were identified as the primary factors that impact access to rTMS: limited awareness of rTMS's existence, financial challenges, physical accessibility, and weighing the pros and cons of medication vs. rTMS.
conclusionsIncreasing the general public's and their health providers' awareness regarding rTMS and other novel treatments is a crucial step toward improving access to care. Greater awareness of rTMS for PPD may support earlier recognition of appropriate candidates, improve referral pathways, and reduce barriers related to knowledge, accessibility, and treatment hesitancy. Further research is needed to continue evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and accessibility of rTMS for PPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.