ArticleBMC oral health2026
A self-supervised pre-training method for lesion segmentation in oral potentially malignant disorders.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSupervised training for oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) image segmentation requires expensive annotated data, particularly scarce in remote regions with few medical specialists. This study aims to propose a self-guided pre-training method to automatically extract features from unlabeled images, enhancing the performance of OPMD lesion segmentation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study utilized 3,417 OPMD photographs from ZJUSS as the internal dataset and two independent external datasets from WCHS and CS-SJTU for validation. The internal labeled dataset was evaluated using five independent patient-level train/validation/test splits to prevent patient-level data leakage. We proposed a multiscale separable attention masked image model, MS-SAMIM, and a self-guided mask generation method. To enhance robustness, we incorporated a teacher-student consistency constraint and a contrastive learning constraint.
resultsOur model achieved 84.35% Dice, 74.65% IoU, 81.84% sensitivity, and 88.02% precision in OPMD lesion segmentation, surpassing various advanced fully supervised and other self-supervised approaches. In the external validation, the model achieved 82.15% Dice, 70.09% IoU, 77.96% sensitivity, and 87.84% precision on external dataset #1 and 81.18% Dice, 69.71% IoU, 78.58% sensitivity, and 84.39% precision on external dataset #2.
conclusionsThe proposed self-guided pre-training strategy may reduce reliance on pixel-level annotations and improve OPMD lesion segmentation from clinical photographs. Further prospective validation is required before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.