ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Ultrasound evaluation of urinary tract morbidity in adults living in a Schistosoma haematobium endemic region in Mozambique.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound-based assessment of urinary tract morbidity remains central to the evaluation of Schistosoma haematobium infection, but the WHO Niamey protocol is operationally complex and has been used mainly in children and higher-transmission settings. We aimed to describe urinary tract structural abnormalities in adults living in an endemic area of Mozambique using a preliminary application of a modified Niamey-derived protocol adapted for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and to compare these findings with parasitological and molecular evidence of infection. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study between April and October 2018 among individuals aged 15 years or older living in the Chókwè Health and Demographic Surveillance System area, Mozambique. Schistosoma haematobium infection was defined by urine filtration and/or DNA detection. Urinary tract ultrasound was performed using a simplified Niamey-derived POCUS protocol. All examinations were performed by a trained investigator, and a subset of images was reviewed remotely for interobserver agreement. PRINCIPAL
findingsOur study included 912 ultrasound exams. The prevalence of ultrasound detected urinary tract abnormalities was 37.9% (95% CI 34.8%-41.2%). Of these, 14.5% were positive for Schistosoma haematobium. We found that 11.8% (95% CI 9.7%-13.9%) had a lower urinary tract abnormality and 29.3% (95% CI 26.7%-32.7%) had an upper urinary tract abnormality. The renal pelvis was the most common location for ultrasound abnormalities (23.1%), followed by the ureters (20.4%) and the bladder wall (11.6%). Interobserver agreement was substantial for bladder findings (κ = 0.65), ureteral findings (κ = 0.78), and the final ultrasound score (κ = 0.63) and moderate for kidney findings (κ = 0.59).
conclusionIn this adult population from a historically endemic area, POCUS identified a substantial burden of urinary tract structural abnormalities despite a relatively low prevalence of current infection. In adults, particularly in low-prevalence or post-control settings, such abnormalities should not be interpreted as specific markers of active schistosomiasis, because they may reflect chronic sequelae, prior infection, or other urinary tract pathology. The study supports the feasibility of a simplified POCUS-adapted protocol under controlled research conditions with a trained operator; future implementation studies are needed before broader use by general clinicians can be recommended. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.