SynthesisBMC public health2026
Comparative efficacy of various physical activity interventions on individuals with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysical activity is a promising non-pharmacological intervention for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but the most effective intervention regimen remains unclear. This study aimed to compare and rank the effects of different types and doses of physical activity on social communication, stereotyped behaviors, and motor skills in individuals with ASD, thereby providing theoretical guidance for physical activity-based interventions.
methodsWe searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SPORTDiscus, PsycInfo and CNKI from inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and controlled studies evaluating the effects of various physical activity interventions on social communication, stereotyped behaviors, or motor skills in individuals with ASD were included. Pairwise analyses and network meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model.
resultsA total of 45 studies involving 1479 participants were included. The results showed that martial arts had the highest possibility of producing the best effects on social communication (SMD = -0.84, 95% CI : -1.31,-0.37), and team ball sports were most likely to be the most effective in reducing stereotyped behaviors (SMD = -1.39, 95% CI: -2.09,-0.68), while mind-body exercise was identified as the most effective physical activity for improving motor skills (SMD = 2.10, 95% CI: 0.45, 3.75). Additionally, for social communication, the best effects were observed with a frequency of 3-4 times per week (SMD = -0.90, 95% CI: -1.34, -0.45), session duration of ≤45 minutes (SMD = -0.67, 95% CI: -0.91, -0.43), and an intervention period of more than 12 weeks (SMD = -0.93, 95% CI: -1.18, -0.68). For stereotyped behaviors, the best effects were observed with a frequency of ≥5 times per week (SMD = -1.40, 95% CI: -2.15, -0.65), session duration of ≤45 minutes (SMD = -0.60, 95% CI: -1.10, -0.10), whereas no statistically significant effects were observed for intervention period; For motor skills, the best effects were associated with a frequency of 3-4 times per week (SMD = 2.02, 95% CI: 0.92, 3.12), session duration of＞60 minutes (SMD = 4.35, 95% CI: 1.44,7.26), and a period of ≤8 weeks (SMD = 2.41, 95% CI: 0.90, 3.91).
conclusionsMartial arts appear to be the most effective intervention for improving social communication, and team ball sports are likely to be the most effective for reducing stereotyped behaviors, whereas mind-body exercises may be the most beneficial for enhancing motor skills in individuals with ASD. In addition, for social communication, the most favorable outcomes were associated with a frequency of 3-4 sessions per week, session duration of ≤45 minutes, and an intervention period of >12 weeks. For stereotyped behaviors, the best effects were observed with a frequency of ≥5 times per week, session duration of ≤45 minutes, however, no statistically significant effects were observed for intervention period. Regarding motor skills, the best effects were found with a frequency of 3-4 times per week, session duration of > 60 minutes, and an intervention period of ≤8 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.