ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Unlocking the potential of bronchoalveolar lavage: a promising supplement therapy for moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBronchoalveolar lavage holds potential therapeutic value for moderate-to-severe asthma that is poorly controlled with standard nebulizer therapy. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) as an adjunctive therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma inadequately controlled by standard inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta₂-agonists therapy.
methodsIn this retrospective study conducted between July 2021 and December 2024, eligible patients were allocated to a control group receiving standard high-pressure nebulizer therapy or a study group receiving additional BAL. Outcomes included changes in asthma symptom scores, pulmonary function, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels, adverse events, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid pathogen distribution.
resultsThe study group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in subjective symptom scores and small airway function parameters compared to controls (P < 0.05). This superiority was particularly pronounced in a predefined subgroup with more severe impairment (FEV1% pred < 50%, FVC% pred < 80%, FEV1/FVC < 65%). No significant differences were observed in FeNO levels or overall adverse event incidence (P > 0.05). BALF analysis in 72 study patients identified 43 distinct pathogens (detection rate: 39.8%), predominantly bacterial species (72.1%).
conclusionAdjunctive BAL significantly improved lung function, especially in small airways, without increasing adverse reactions, demonstrating a favorable safety profile in patients with uncontrolled allergic asthma, supports BAL's potential as a therapeutic procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.