Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42271279›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2026

Clinical presentation domains and venous anatomical patterns in cerebral venous thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Amirreza Radfar, Etrat Hooshmandi, Vahid Reza Ostovan, Sedighe Hooshmandi, Maryam Poursadeghfard, Nima Fadakar, Mahnaz Bayat

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amirreza RadfarClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Etrat HooshmandiClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Vahid Reza OstovanClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sedighe HooshmandiMedical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam PoursadeghfardClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Nima FadakarClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. drfanima@gmail.com.
Mahnaz BayatClinical Neurology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. mbayat53@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) presents with heterogeneous clinical manifestations that may partly reflect differences in venous anatomical involvement. However, systematic evaluation of structured clinical presentation domains in relation to distinct venous involvement patterns remains limited.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of consecutive adult patients with radiologically confirmed CVT at a tertiary referral center between 2017 and 2025. Presenting symptoms were categorized into predefined, non-mutually exclusive clinical presentation domains, and venous anatomical involvement was classified as isolated superficial thrombosis, isolated parenchymal thrombosis, or combined superficial and parenchymal thrombosis. Domain distributions and overall presentation burden were compared across anatomical patterns, and associations between clinical domains and venous involvement were examined using multinomial logistic regression.

resultsAmong 325 patients (median age 39.4 years; 68% female), superficial venous involvement was observed in 68.9%, combined involvement in 22.5%, and isolated parenchymal thrombosis in 8.6%. Intracranial hypertension-related presentation was independently associated with combined thrombosis compared with isolated superficial involvement (adjusted OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.07-10.14). Visual presentation was inversely associated with isolated parenchymal thrombosis (adjusted OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.94). Other clinical domains, including cortical irritation-related presentation and deep cerebral dysfunction, were not independently associated with venous anatomical patterns. Overall presentation burden did not differ significantly across anatomical groups.

conclusionPredefined clinical presentation domains show selective but limited associations with venous anatomical patterns in CVT. Intracranial hypertension-related presentation was associated with combined venous involvement, whereas the inverse association between visual presentation and isolated parenchymal thrombosis should be interpreted cautiously. Substantial clinical overlap across anatomical groups underscores the complex and multifactorial nature of clinical-anatomical relationships in CVT. CLINICAL

trial registrationNot applicable. This study was an observational retrospective cohort study and was not registered as a clinical trial.

Indexed as

Cerebral VeinsIntracranial ThrombosisVenous ThrombosisAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCerebral venous thrombosisClinical–anatomical correlationClinical presentationPhenotypingVenous anatomical involvement

Identifiers

PMID42271279
PMCPMC13480053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.