ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Beyond technical access in digital eldercare: how ethical lag shapes stratified responsiveness to institutional welfare in rural China.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital elder care services have been widely promoted to address population ageing, yet their uptake among rural older adults remains limited even when access and affordability are ensured. Existing studies largely attribute this gap to digital literacy or technical barriers, while insufficient attention has been paid to the moral and ethical meanings through which older adults interpret institutional care.
methodsThis study adopted a mixed-methods design in Shapingba District, Chongqing, China. Quantitative data were collected from 400 rural older adults aged 60 and above and analysed using structural equation modelling. In-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 outliers from the quantitative phase were conducted to explore moral reasoning, care expectations, and lived experiences with digital services.
resultsQuantitative results showed that Care Acceptability was the most consistent direct predictor of behavioral intention. By contrast, Privacy and Data Protection and Dignity in Care exerted weaker direct effects and were more likely to influence behavioral intention indirectly through perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Qualitative findings further identified three response patterns: adaptive translation, ethical dissonance, and translation failure. These patterns reflect an ethical lag, whereby localized care expectations adapt more slowly than technological reforms, leading to stratified engagement among rural older adults.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that limited uptake of digital elder care is closely tied to moral legitimacy and ethical recognition. Digital care services are more likely to be accepted when perceived as a supportive extension of, rather than a replacement for, family care responsibilities. Addressing ethical lag through culturally resonant service design and trusted community mediation may help reduce inequalities in engagement and improve the effectiveness of ageing-related service provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.