Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42271212›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

Transfer learning for T-cell response prediction.

Josua Stadelmaier, Brandon Malone, Ralf Eggeling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josua StadelmaierDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. josua.stadelmaier@uni-tuebingen.de.
Brandon MaloneNEC OncoImmunity, Oslo, Norway.
Ralf EggelingDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the prediction of T-cell response for specific given peptides, which could, among other applications, be a crucial step towards the development of personalized cancer vaccines. It is a challenging task due to limited, heterogeneous training data featuring a multi-domain structure; such data entail the danger of shortcut learning, where models learn general characteristics of peptide sources, such as the source organism, rather than specific peptide characteristics associated with T-cell response. Using a transformer model for T-cell response prediction, we show that the danger of inflated predictive performance is not merely theoretical but occurs in practice. Consequently, we propose a domain-aware evaluation scheme. We then study different transfer learning techniques to deal with the multi-domain structure and shortcut learning. We demonstrate a per-source fine tuning approach to be effective across a wide range of peptide sources and further show that our final model is competitive with existing state-of-the-art approaches for predicting T-cell responses for human peptides.

Indexed as

PeptidesT-LymphocytesTransfer Machine LearningHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPeptidesDomain adaptationMHCPeptidesShortcut learningT cellsTransformers

Identifiers

PMID42271212
PMCPMC13251289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.