SynthesisJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026
A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Role of Entrustment in Pre-Registration Healthcare Practice-Based Learning: Implications for Dietetics Education.
Synthesis in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Role of Entrustment in Pre-Registration Healthcare Practice-Based Learning: Implications for Dietetics Education.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This qualitative systematic review explored how entrustment is understood, experienced and enacted within pre-registration practice-based learning (PBL) across international healthcare education, with a specific focus on implications for the UK dietetic profession. Fifteen qualitative and mixed methods studies were synthesised using thematic synthesis, identifying how entrustment shapes learner participation, supervision, and capability development. The review found that entrustment functions as a 'credible developmental space' that enables learners to engage in authentic workplace activities with supported autonomy, while also revealing how workplace pressures and local contextual factors influence entrustment decisions. Feedback emerged as the central mechanism through which learners make sense of supervision levels, understand expectations, and professionally develop; without high quality dialogic feedback, entrustment risks becoming a procedural rather than educational process. Entrustment was shown to be inherently relational and co-constructed, shaped by trust, supervisor familiarity, contextual constraints, perceived risk, and the quality of supervisory relationships. These findings challenge overly technical or checklist based interpretations of entrustment and highlight the need for assessment approaches that prioritise narrative feedback, shared sensemaking and contextual awareness. For UK dietetics, an entrustment informed approach offers a defensible, capability-aligned way to structure PBL across diverse settings, particularly as the profession implements a national common assessment tool. A proportionate, light touch approach, using a small number of meaningful EPA aligned tasks supported by succinct narrative feedback, may enhance developmental value without increasing burdens on practice educators. Entrustment has the potential to strengthen fairness, consistency, and capability development in dietetic PBL when implemented in a relational, context sensitive manner. These insights have relevance globally, providing a conceptual foundation for international dietetics and wider health professions to strengthen supervision and assessment in diverse PBL contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.