ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Anatomical description of the jaw muscles and theoretical bite force assessment in South American opossums using manual and digital dissection methods.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 3D atlas of the trigeminal nerve and its relevance for comparative studies of the masticatory apparatus in rodents.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Anatomical description of the jaw muscles and theoretical bite force assessment in South American opossums using manual and digital dissection methods.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marsupials (Marsupialia, Mammalia) represent an ecologically diverse clade. This is particularly true for opossums (South American marsupials), which are, however, often difficult to observe and collect. Consequently, few studies have focused on their bite force and the muscles of their masticatory apparatus, and only scant information on the diet of many species exists. Here we describe the masticatory muscles of several previously unstudied opossum species including Caenolestes fuliginosus, Dromiciops gliroides and Monodelphis touan. We calculate the bite force of these species using data from both manual and digital dissections and compare their theoretical bite forces with literature data. Additionally, we explore the differences between manual and digital dissection to determine the muscle PCSA (physiological cross-sectional area). The results highlighted variation in the position of the muscular attachments and muscle size as well as in the distribution of each muscle in the masticatory apparatus, with a larger temporal complex in M. touan and a larger zygomasseteric complex in D. gliroides. The bite forces are coherent with estimates from the literature suggesting that our biomechanical model is reliable. The comparison between manual and digital dissections showed that while digital dissection allows an overall description of the masticatory muscles, it is more complex to accurately describe the different subdivisions of the muscle bundles. The use of digital volumes to calculate the PCSA remains to be evaluated. Digital dissection data can complement manual dissection data, provided that the composite structure of muscles and the physiological changes during impregnation with contrast agents are better understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.