ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on risk assessment method of wireline logging sticking and analysis of sensitive factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, a quantitative evaluation method of wireline logging adhesion during jacking operation is proposed based on the soft string model Firstly, the principle of cable sticking is elucidated in order to judge the cable logging sticking. Then, combined with the soft rod model, the calculation theory of wireline logging adhesion is proposed, and the evaluation model of wireline logging adhesion is established. The model quantifies the risk of wireline sticking, and proposes a risk probability assessment method for wireline sticking during jacking. Finally, a case study of an actual well was conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed assessment method. The results show that this well shows signs of wireline logging sticking, and the assessment method is consistent with the actual field observations. An analysis of the sensitive factors influencing cable adhesion and sticking reveals that the cable adhesion and sticking risk is most sensitive to wellbore inclination and drilling fluid density. Considering the combined effects of the main sensitive factors, the overall cable adhesion and sticking risk is reduced by approximately 35%. The results demonstrate that the cable adhesion and sticking evaluation method established in this study is effective, capable of assessing the risk of cable adhesion and sticking in new wells. The method is scientifically sound and has practical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.