ArticleNeurology and therapy2026
Descriptive Analysis of Retrospective Observational Real-World Evidence of a Monoclonal Anti-Amyloid Therapy Program in a Wide Catchment Specialty Memory Clinic.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnti-amyloid therapy (AAT) protocol complexity may widen specialty dementia care access gaps. The University of Colorado (CU) Advanced Therapy in Neurodegenerative Disorders (ATND) Clinic is within the CU-Memory Disorders Clinic (CU-MDC). The aim of this study is to report initial CU-ATND real-world evidence (RWE).
methodsPatients who completed CU-ATND Clinic intake paperwork were included (n = 123) and compared to CU-MDC (n = 1100) seen between April 2024 to June 2025. Demographic information was included for both clinics. Retrospective observational data on CU-ATND Clinic patients including work-up, decisions about pursing AAT, and adverse events at the time of data extraction was described.
resultsAAT status included patient declined (37.4%) or deferred (8.1%), clinically excluded (14.6%), undergoing work-up (8.1%), consented for infusions (26.0%), completed infusions (0.8%), and stopped infusions (4.1%). CU-ATND Clinic patients had a median age of 73 years and were 50.4% women with the majority white and urban-dwelling similar to the CU-MDC. AAT candidacy steps and decision duration varied. AAT-related adverse events were managed without extended inpatient admission or persistent effects.
conclusionMany care disparities were present prior to CU-ATND referral. The CU-ATND RWE highlights successes and provides insight into barriers impacting access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.