ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026
Anxiety, stress, and affective modulation on object-location memory: A systematic review in virtual environments.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Object-location memory (OLM) is the ability to encode and retrieve spatial relationships between objects by using egocentric or allocentric reference frames. Critically, OLM is modulated by emotional memory systems that engage amygdala-hippocampal and arousal-related mechanisms that can bias or disrupt spatial encoding. Despite evidence that emotion shapes memory, its specific impact on OLM remains unclear, particularly in digital contexts. This systematic review examined how emotional valence, particularly stress and anxiety, modulates OLM performance in computer-based and virtual/augmented reality tasks. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, and PubMed. Twelve empirical studies published up to 2025 met the inclusion criteria. Results revealed sex-specific effects: anxious women tended to rely on egocentric strategies, whereas stressed men showed greater allocentric flexibility. The timing of stress exposure was critical, often disrupting encoding but occasionally facilitating retrieval. Emotional valence differentially influenced performance: positive stimuli enhanced spatial accuracy, whereas negative stimuli accelerated response times. Spatial working memory (SWM) and mental rotation emerged as key cognitive resources supporting flexible spatial learning, while physiological stress markers showed only weak associations with behavioral outcomes. Future research should standardize paradigms, explore digital and immersive environments, include diverse populations, and clarify theoretical distinctions among arousal, valence, anxiety, and stress to better understand how emotional states shape spatial memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42271101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.