Trial reportLasers in medical science2026
Combined effects of photobiomodulation and osteopathic manipulation on the physical performance of young adults subjected to exercise-induced muscle damage: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the combined effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) and osteopathic manipulation (OM) on the physical performance of young adults subjected to exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). The study is a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Forty-five physically active male individuals were included and randomized into four groups: placebo (PL), PBM, OM, and PBM + OM. A red-light emitting diode (LED) (λ = 650 nm) was used. Participants in the PBM and PBM + OM groups received 144 J of energy in the right lower limb and/or underwent bilateral lumbar and pelvic manipulation (OM and PBM + OM) before the EIMD protocol. The following variables were analyzed before, immediately after, and 24, 48, and 72 h post-intervention: creatine kinase (CK), muscle strength, flexibility, and horizontal jump performance. Data normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. CK levels were evaluated using the Friedman test, and repeated measures ANOVA was used for the other variables, p < 0.05. A distinct recovery pattern was observed in the combined PBM + OM group, with increased CK levels only at 24 h, followed by a pronounced reduction at 72 h (p = 0.001). Only the PBM + OM group presented percentage values near to baseline within 48 h (-1.4%), in addition to a trend toward early improvement in the horizontal jump within 24 h. In conclusion, PBM + OM may have contributed to improved CK kinetics and selected functional outcomes; however, strength recovery should be interpreted strictly as a non-significant and exploratory trend.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.