ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Identification of chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriages using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChromosome abnormalities are a known cause of miscarriage. A detailed chromosomal study in miscarriages is delineated using high-throughput technologies.
methods564 miscarriages were collected, and the chromosomal abnormalities, including triploidy, trisomy, monosomy, uniparental disomy, and chromosomal deletions/duplications in miscarriages, were detected by high-throughput single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array.
resultsThere were 336 (59.6%) miscarriages with chromosomal abnormalities, including 325 (57.6%) miscarriages with pathogenic variants and 11 (2%) miscarriages with variations of unknown significance (VOUS). The remaining 228 (40.4%) miscarriages had no clinically relevant chromosomal variants. Among the 325 miscarriages with pathogenic variants, 23 miscarriages had triploidy and two miscarriages showed genome-wide uniparental disomy. Trisomy was found in 225 miscarriages and involved nearly every chromosome. Monosomy X was found in 39 miscarriages. Also, 32 miscarriages were with partial chromosomal deletions/duplications, particularly in 8p23 and Xp22 regions.
conclusionsOur results confirmed that trisomy and monosomy X are potentially the most common causes of miscarriage. We also showed that chromosomal pathogenic deletions/duplications are involved with miscarriage. However, still nearly 40% of miscarriages had no chromosomal variants detected by SNP array. This may be attributed to a single gene mutation that requires high-throughput sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.