ArticleBehavior research methods2026
The Person-Reported Outcome of Conversational Success (PROCS): Tool development and psychometric validation.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the centrality of successful conversation to well-being, psychometrically developed and validated tools to measure this construct are lacking. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the Person-Reported Outcome of Conversational Success (PROCS), a measure of conversational success. We define success as the degree to which an interlocutor evaluates a conversation as beneficial, worthwhile, and/or satisfactory. In phase one of development, an initial draft of the PROCS was created based on a literature review, expert input, and established frameworks in communication research. In phase two, cognitive interviews were conducted with 39 participants to assess the measure's content, format, and usability and further refine the measure. In phase three, 50 participants completed the PROCS in live embodied conversations to assess the measure's practical effectiveness and usability. Finally, in phase four, psychometric validation was completed using data from 817 participants who completed the PROCS based on recently recalled conversations. The final version of the PROCS can be used to quantify the success of a single conversation. Careful planning of the initial draft of the PROCS coupled with input from participants from a diverse set of user groups across multiple phases of development, ensures the measure's validity, clarity, usability, and versatility. The PROCS is a valuable tool for assessing conversational success, with applications in both research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.