ArticleScientific reports2026
StyleGAN-based synthetic image augmentation for multi-class otoscopy image classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parametric Physically Grounded Rendering of Otoscopic Morphology for Synthetic Medical Image Generation.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of eardrum abnormalities is pivotal for effectively managing various ear conditions. Otoscopy, a non-invasive diagnostic procedure, provides detailed views of the ear canal and eardrum to identify pathologies such as otitis media, tympanic membrane perforations, and other abnormalities. Despite advancements, classifying otoscopy images remains challenging due to lighting variations, motion blur, and diverse abnormalities, exacerbated by limited labeled datasets and subjective assessments. A significant barrier to accurate diagnosis is the lack of an objective evaluation method for eardrums, such as machine learning techniques to classify images as normal or abnormal. Moreover, when processing otoscopy videos, traditional approaches require extensive manual expertise to select representative frames for analysis. This study investigates the efficacy of artificial image augmentation using StyleGAN3 to enhance otoscopy image classification accuracy. Augmented datasets comprising artificial and composite otoscopy images were used to train and validate a ResNet-101 model. A total of 816 artificial and 816 composite images (250-Effusion, 340-Normal, 113-Perforation, and 113-Tympanosclerosis) and 80,685 classic augmented images (24651-Effusion, 33660-Normal, 11187-Perforation, and 11187-Tympanosclerosis) were used. Results demonstrate that integrating StyleGAN3-generated synthetic images significantly improves classification performance. Our approach achieved a mean test accuracy of 0.95 ± 0.03 and an F1-score of 0.96 ± 0.02, surpassing those of traditional augmentation methods, while representing an optimistic upper-bound scenario. In contrast, without any augmentation, the accuracy and F1-score are 0.82 ± 0.03 and 0.78 ± 0.02, respectively, and with classic augmentations, they are 0.87 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.02, respectively. These findings underscore the potential of GAN-based augmentation to bolster eardrum image classification systems and address challenges in diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.