Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270874›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluating and optimizing public service facilities within the 15-min community life circle-evidence from Nanchang, China.

Min Wu, Junhong Chen, Kaige Zheng, Jiaxin Zhang, Shihang Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Min WuArchitecture and Design College, Nanchang University, No. 999, Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, 330031, Nanchang, China.
Junhong ChenArchitecture and Design College, Nanchang University, No. 999, Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, 330031, Nanchang, China.
Kaige ZhengArchitecture and Design College, Nanchang University, No. 999, Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, 330031, Nanchang, China.
Jiaxin ZhangArchitecture and Design College, Nanchang University, No. 999, Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, 330031, Nanchang, China. jiaxin.arch@ncu.edu.cn.
Shihang WuFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As urban areas expand rapidly, the development of public service facilities has become a critical strategy for optimizing urban spatial structures and addressing the diverse, high-quality living needs of residents. This study presents a referable and evidence-based closed-loop framework for evaluating and optimizing public service facilities within the "15-min community life circle," specifically applied to Nanchang, China. By analyzing the spatial distribution, accessibility, and developmental coordination of 28,082 public service facilities within the six districts and three counties of Nanchang, the research findings reveal that: (1) significant spatial heterogeneity exists in the distribution and accessibility of public service facilities within the study area; (2) the overall coverage efficiency of the 24 categories of public service facilities is low, with notable disparities in coverage among different facility types; and (3) a mismatch exists between the supply of public service facilities and the population distribution. Furthermore, by employing a location allocation model and considering the current developmental context of Nanchang City, we propose targeted optimization strategies for areas experiencing supply-demand mismatches. The findings offer decision support for policymakers in formulating targeted urban renewal strategies and have practical implications for promoting the high-quality development of the 15-min living circle.

Indexed as

15-min community living circleOptimization of spatial layoutPoints of interest (POI)Public service facilities

Identifiers

PMID42270874
PMCPMC13500508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.