Trial reportScientific reports2026
IMSI does not improve pregnancy outcomes and live birth rate in severe teratozoospermia patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the beneficial roles of the MSOME technique over × 400 magnification in terms of pregnancy outcomes, Live birth rate (LBR) and miscarriage rate in patients with severe teratozoospermia. This trial was conducted on 100 infertile couples with severe teratozoospermia who were randomly divided into ICSI and IMSI groups. Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and relative sperm telomere length (r-STL) were evaluated in raw semen samples, processed samples, and selected spermatozoa at × 400 magnification in the ICSI group and by high magnification in the IMSI group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of DFI (F = 0.523, P = 0.515) and r-STL (F = 0.507, P = 0.565) of the selected spermatozoa after each procedure of sperm selection. No statistically remarkable differences were seen between ICSI and IMSI groups in terms of fertilization rate (67.46% vs 63.67%, P = 0.649), chemical (37.20% vs 24.44%, P = 0.194), clinical (30.23% vs 20%, P = 0.456) and ongoing pregnancy (27.90% vs 17.80%, P = 0.122), LBR (30.23% vs 15.55%. P = 0.257) and miscarriage rate (0% vs 18.18%, P = 0.332). The study concluded that the superiority of MSOME technique over × 400 magnification was not confirmed in terms of DFI and STL of selected spermatozoa, pregnancy outcomes, LBR and miscarriage rate in patients with severe teratozoospermia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.