Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270863›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of water conservation capacity in Lanzhou City.

Huimin Hou, Feng Guo, Pengquan Wang, Di Lu, Changjie Chen, Junxing Bai, Haohao Li, Zhiqiang Bao, Mingyang Qin, Yufei Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Huimin HouLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Feng GuoLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China. gf510225@163.com.
Pengquan WangQinghai Minzu University, Xining, 810007, Qinghai Province, China.
Di LuLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Changjie ChenLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Junxing BaiLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Haohao LiLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Zhiqiang BaoLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Mingyang QinLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Yufei LiuLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.
Xinjian FanLanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, Gansu Province, China.

Funding

Lanzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (Science and Technology Support Special) 2024-3-84Major special plan for science and technology in Gansu Province 22ZD6WA043the Gansu Provincial Water Conservancy Scientific Experimental Research and technology promotion project 23GSLK039the Gansu Provincial Water Conservancy Scientific Experimental Research and technology promotion project 25GSLK045the Gansu Provincial Water Conservancy Scientific Experimental Research and technology promotion project 25GSLK070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water conservation services serve as a pivotal ecosystem service for water regulation and storage, which is of great significance for alleviating water scarcity and addressing climate change. Taking Lanzhou City as the research area, this study adopted long-term sequential land use, meteorological and socio-economic datasets from 2000 to 2023. By integrating the PLUS model, InVEST model and the interpretable machine learning framework of XGBoost-SHAP, this paper systematically explored the spatio-temporal evolution, driving mechanisms and future scenario responses of water conservation capacity. The results showed that: (1) Water conservation capacity in Lanzhou experienced prominent interannual fluctuations from 2000 to 2023 without any statistically significant long-term trend. Spatially, it generally presented a distribution pattern with high values concentrated in the northwestern and southern mountainous areas and low values distributed in central river valleys and southeastern regions. (2) Soil saturated water content, precipitation and NDVI were the core positive driving factors, while human activity intensity was the dominant negative driving factor. Complex nonlinear synergistic and antagonistic interactions existed among multiple influencing factors, and their influencing directions varied dynamically with factor intensity. (3) By 2050, the spatial pattern of water conservation capacity under different climatic and socio-economic scenarios will remain basically consistent with that in 2020, while its total volume is highly sensitive to scenario selection. Under the SSP1-2.6 pathway, the ecological protection scenario exhibits the highest water conservation capacity (2872.82 × 10

Indexed as

CMIP6InVEST modelLand use changeWater conservation capacityXGBoost-SHAP model

Identifiers

PMID42270863
PMCPMC13500505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.