Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270859›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Detecting application layer DDoS attack using an advanced signature detection algorithm.

Abdul Ghafar Jaafar, Md Asri Ngadi, Nazri Kama, Nazhatul Hafizah Kamarudin, Khairol Shapawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdul Ghafar JaafarFaculty of Artificial Intelligence, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. abdulghafar@utm.my.
Md Asri NgadiFaculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
Nazri KamaFaculty of Artificial Intelligence, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Nazhatul Hafizah KamarudinCentre for Cyber Security, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Khairol ShapawiKYROL Security Labs Sdn. Bhd, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.

Funding

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM Encouragement Research (UTMER) PY/2024/00571, Q.K130000.3857.42J38
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Application-layer Distributed Denial of Service (App-DDoS) attacks are an ongoing issue in the cyber security world. The attack constructs request headers and uses a large number of channels to disrupt targeted services, such as an automated attack tool. A variety of approaches have been attempted, but the detection of attacks through the identification of forged request headers is a significant gap in the research. Signature detection, which shows a strong ability to accurately identify attacks with low false positive and false negative rates, can be used to address this challenge. The paper introduces a new detection method to categorize traffic as malicious or legitimate by analyzing the request headers of the traffic. To address the concerns of various researchers regarding outdated attack patterns and the lack of datasets available for public research, the dataset used in this research is recent and representative of real-world App DDoS attack patterns. The signature detection demonstrates promising performance in detecting the attack with the latest data set, which has strong implications for adaptation to real-world applications. The key contributions of this study are the proposed detection algorithms that can detect forged request headers at the initial stage, prior to their processing by the web server, and the practical analysis, which showed that the attack strategy approach relies on the manipulation of request headers. The hybrid feature selection method employed in this research was proven to be workable and successfully identified the features which contribute significantly to the detection performance with an accuracy of 96.93%, a precision of 99.11%, a recall of 97.55%, and an F1-score of 98.32%. These results demonstrate that the signature-based detection is effective and appropriate for detecting the attack. Although Machine Learning (ML) is gaining traction, signature-based detection can still be effective for checking signatories generated by the attack in the request headers.

Identifiers

PMID42270859
PMCPMC13503874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.