Trial reportScientific reports2026
Exploring pain sensitivity changes after acceptance and attention bias modification trainings: preliminary evidence on fear of pain and attention bias.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive trainings for pain are suggested as promising interventions targeting core mechanisms related to pain. However, their efficacy varies greatly, and the factors that moderate training efficacy are poorly understood. Thus, this study investigated how individual characteristics influence the effectiveness of two commonly used cognitive trainings, attention bias modification (ABM) and acceptance training, in modulating experimental pain. Eighty healthy females attended two sessions of either pain acceptance training or pain ABM training. Each participant underwent one active training session and one control session in a randomized order. Pre- and post-training assessments included emotional questionnaires, attention bias tasks, and quantitative sensory testing (QST). At the group level, both active trainings reduced sensitivity to the heat temperature participants were trained on, but were not more effective than the control conditions, and no other group-level improvements emerged in other pain sub-modalities. Nevertheless, greater attentional interference from pain-related images and higher fear of pain at baseline predicted greater reductions in heat pain sensitivity following the acceptance training. These preliminary findings emphasize the importance of baseline cognitive and emotional traits in shaping the efficacy of acceptance-based interventions. Tailoring interventions to individual profiles may enhance treatment outcomes, warranting further research into personalized approaches for pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.