ArticleScientific reports2026
Patient experiences and perceptions of occupational therapy services in Chinese rehabilitation: a qualitative study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is a critical determinant of rehabilitation outcomes in occupational therapy (OT). In non-Western contexts such as China, cultural norms including high power distance may profoundly shape the therapeutic relationship and patient experience. Few qualitative studies have explored the lived experiences of Chinese rehabilitation patients regarding OT services. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of Chinese rehabilitation patients regarding their OT services and to identify key factors that promote or hinder patient satisfaction from the patients' perspective. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with ten participants purposively recruited from a rehabilitation department in China. Data collection continued until data saturation was achieved. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative descriptive thematic analysis, facilitated by NVivo software. The study adhered to the COREQ guidelines, and trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation, member checking, and reflexivity. Thematic analysis yielded four major themes: (1) Pathways to Initiation and Motivation for OT, characterized by passive entry via professional referral and trust in authority; (2) The Lived Experience of the Therapeutic Process, marked by passive compliance, monotonous activities, and a perceived lack of individualized, person-centered care; (3) Perceived Outcomes and Functional Gains, reflected patient-reported gains in physical function, daily living skills, and participation in community life; and (4) Facilitators and Barriers to Satisfaction, with therapist attentiveness and communication emerging as the strongest facilitators, while financial burden constituted the most significant barrier. This study reveals significant tensions between person-centered care ideals and standardized service delivery in Chinese OT practice. To enhance patient satisfaction with occupational therapy services in China, a multi-pronged approach is needed, encompassing strengthened public education and physician rehabilitation literacy to improve referrals, enhanced therapist training in clinical reasoning and individualized activity design, prioritized development of therapeutic communication skills, and integration of modern technology into treatment. Future research should develop culturally adapted shared decision-making models, design interventions to sustain motivation during functional plateaus, and evaluate the impact of policy reforms such as expanded insurance coverage on long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.