Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270838›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Preoperative 3D surgical planning using Mimics significantly decreased the rate of internal fixation in cervical dumbbell tumor resection and improved the postoperative outcome: a single-center retrospective study.

Hui Wang, Zhiwen Qin, Hailin Lyu, Lu Gao, Ke Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. doctorwanghui@hotmail.com.
Zhiwen QinDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hailin LyuDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Lu GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Ke ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. zhangke@ahmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCompare preoperative Mimics 3D planning and conventional planning on internal fixation and perioperative outcomes in cervical dumbbell tumor resection.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with cervical dumbbell tumors undergoing posterior resection (2017-2025). Subjects were split into two groups by preoperative planning: Mimics 3D (n = 20) or conventional (n = 20). The primary outcome was internal fixation rate. Secondary outcomes were defined as: operation time (minutes from incision to wound closure), estimated intraoperative blood loss (measured in milliliters), length of postoperative hospital stay (days from surgery to discharge), functional improvement (assessed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score and American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] scale), and the rate of postoperative complications. Subgroup analyses were performed by tumor location (C4-C7, C2-C4&C7-T1).

resultsGroups had similar baseline characteristics. In the Mimics group, surgeons used internal fixation in 45.0% of cases, compared with 95.0% in the control group. The absolute risk reduction was 50.0% (*p*<0.001). This trend held across spine regions: for C4-C7, surgeons used fixation in 33.3% (Mimics) vs. 87.5% (control) (*p*=0.015); for C2-C4 & C7-T1, they used it in 54.5% (Mimics) vs. 100.0% (control) (*p*=0.005; *p* for interaction = 0.196). Surgeons working with 3D planning operated more quickly (187 ± 22.0 min vs. 222 ± 32.1 min, *p*<0.001) and discharged patients sooner (5.5 ± 1.64 days vs. 8.5 ± 1.93 days, *p*<0.001). Patients in the Mimics group improved more in JOA scores (+ 3.70 ± 0.85 vs. +2.05 ± 0.82, *p*<0.001) and experienced fewer complications (15.0% vs. 50.0%, *p*=0.034).

conclusionPreoperative Mimics 3D planning reduces the need for internal fixation and enhances postoperative outcomes, underscoring its essential role in the management of cervical dumbbell tumors.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeImaging, Three-DimensionalSpinal NeoplasmsSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSpinal FusionTreatment OutcomeImaging, three-dimensionalNeurilemmomaSpinal neoplasmsSurgical Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.