ArticleScientific reports2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of anesthesiology healthcare professionals regarding crisis resource management in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of anesthesiology healthcare professionals concerning crisis resource management (CRM). A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shanghai between November 20, 2024, and December 31, 2024. Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire in Chinese based on published CRM/ACRM evidence summaries and educational resources. A total of 407 valid responses were obtained, yielding a valid response rate of 93.14%. Among the respondents, 281 (69.04%) were affiliated with public tertiary hospitals, 174 (42.75%) were primarily based in the operating room (OR) versus other anesthesiology work settings, and 223 (54.79%) were physicians. The mean self-perceived familiarity (knowledge), attitude, and practice scores were 12.39 ± 3.47 (possible range: 0-20), 30.85 ± 4.74 (possible range: 8-40), and 36.18 ± 6.95 (possible range: 10-50), respectively. In the prespecified path analysis (SEM) using summed KAP scores, knowledge was significantly associated with attitude and practice in the prespecified path model, and attitude was significantly associated with practice; knowledge was also indirectly associated with practice through attitude within the theoretical model (all P < 0.001). Anesthesiology healthcare professionals demonstrated moderate levels of self-perceived knowledge, generally positive attitudes, and frequent CRM-related practices, with significant associations among these components. These findings suggest that CRM-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices are statistically associated within this cross-sectional framework, although causal relationships cannot be inferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.