Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270804›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Decriminalizing same-sex relationships and its impact on social media discussions in Asia.

Kokil Jaidka, Preetika Verma, Yiting Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kokil JaidkaDepartment of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. jaidka@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8127-1157
Preetika VermaSchool of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4018-0425
Yiting ChenSchool of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While legal reforms may coincide with shifts in public discourse, broader normative change often remains uneven and context dependent. Since 2018, four Asian countries-India, Taiwan, Thailand and Singapore-have decriminalized same-sex relationships, providing an opportunity to examine how such institutional changes are associated with public discussions of LGBTQ+ topics. Here, using supervised and unsupervised natural language processing methods, we analysed 136,255 Facebook news posts and 65,969 public Instagram captions within a 100-day window before and after each reform. To contextualize online discourse with offline sentiment, we incorporated nationally representative survey data from the Gallup World Poll (N = 46,200). Following decriminalization, online discussions were characterized by reduced moralized and affectively negative language, particularly in contexts with greater freedom of expression. By contrast, offline perceptions of neighbourhood safety for same-sex couples shifted more modestly and unevenly across age groups and countries.

Indexed as

HomosexualitySocial MediaAsiaFemaleHumansIndiaMaleSingaporeTaiwanThailand

Identifiers

PMID42270804
PMCPMC13485699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.