ReviewEMBO reports2026
Molecular evolution in light of regulatory-coding epistasis.
Review in EMBO reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting the fitness effects of mutations is central to understanding molecular evolution and interpreting genome sequence data. Such predictions remain challenging due to the inter-dependent roles of coding and non-coding genetic variation. While coding mutations alter protein structure, stability, activity, and sometimes abundance, regulatory mutations modulate gene expression timing and levels. Because coding and regulatory variation are thought to independently impact features of protein function, their combined effects or complex phenotypes are often unexpected. In particular, regulatory-coding epistasis, whereby the fitness effect of a coding mutation depends on the regulatory background, can reshape fitness landscapes and influence adaptive trajectories. In this review, we explore how variation in protein abundance and activity jointly shape fitness, constrain adaptation, and impact molecular evolution. Drawing on examples from systematic studies carried out in unicellular organisms, we speculate on a fitness function integrating abundance and activity and discuss the broader implications of these interactions for evolutionary dynamics, genetic disease, and phenotypic diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.