ArticleCommunications biology2026
Reinforcement-learning signals support dynamic adaptive control during language switching.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reinforcement-learning signals support dynamic adaptive control during language switching.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Language switching exemplifies a real-world model of adaptive control, as bilinguals select languages in response to continuously changing contextual demands. Although the Adaptive Control Hypothesis (ACH) highlights context-dependent language control in bilinguals, how these strategies are learned remains unclear. Drawing on reinforcement learning (RL) theory, we examined whether reward prediction error (RPE) drives adjustments in voluntary language switching. Chinese-English bilinguals performed a voluntary picture-naming task with probabilistic (i.e., high, medium, and low) reward feedback that generated RPE depending on the switch decisions. Computational modeling revealed that RPE dynamically updated an abstract, generalizable switch policy. Representational similarity analysis (RSA) suggested the learned value of the control policy was represented in the MTL, whereas RPE representations emerged in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Furthermore, connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) revealed a multi-stage network process. A distributed, cross-network pattern initially supported early exploratory learning, which then transitioned into a centralized, hub-centric network for policy exploitation. Finally, the network specialized into a localized circuit for policy automation, coupled with a globally distributed network for monitoring unexpected errors. Together, these findings establish adaptive language control as a value-based RL process. This provides a neurocomputational framework for strategy learning, extending RL principles from simple stimulus-response to high-level cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.