Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270757›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Feasibility and performance evaluation of a robotic steerable endoscopic submucosal dissection knife (with video).

Sang Hyun Kim, Chanwoo Kim, JaeYoun Kim, Woocheol Shin, Hyuk Soon Choi, Han Jo Jeon, Jae Min Lee, Eun Sun Kim, Bora Keum, Yoon Tae Jeen and 1 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sang Hyun Kim *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Chanwoo Kim *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
JaeYoun KimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woocheol ShinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyuk Soon ChoiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. mdkorea@gmail.com.
Han Jo JeonDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Min LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Sun KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Bora KeumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon Tae JeenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Daehie HongDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI22C0935Korea University K2503361Ministry of SMEs and Startups RS-2023-00321839National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2024-00341814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires high precision and dexterity and poses significant challenges for novice operators. Robotic steerable ESD knives have been developed to improve tip control and reduce the technical difficulties associated with conventional instruments. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of a novel robotic-steerable ESD knife using simulated tissue models and to compare procedural outcomes between novice and expert endoscopists. Two experts and two novice endoscopists performed standardized ESD procedures using synthetic gastric tissue models. The experiments compared two modalities, robotic knife-assisted ESD (RESD) and conventional knife-assisted ESD (CESD). Each operator performed five procedures for each method. Performance metrics included total procedure time, submucosal dissection speed, dissection accuracy, and incidence of procedural complications. Twenty RESD and CESD procedures were analyzed. The RESD group demonstrated a significantly shorter total procedure time (30.1 ± 13.1 min) compared with CESD (42.3 ± 17.4 min; P < 0.05). Submucosal dissection speed was also significantly higher in RESD (48.3 ± 7.8 mm²/min) than in CESD (20.2 ± 7.4 mm²/min; P < 0.05). Furthermore, dissection accuracy was markedly higher with RESD than with CESD (91.1 ± 4.9% vs. 75.1 ± 14.1%, P < 0.05). The steerable robotic ESD knife facilitated a more controlled and precise submucosal dissection, particularly aiding novice endoscopists in overcoming technical challenges. These findings indicate that robotic knife-assisted ESD may enhance procedural performance, with pronounced benefits for less-experienced operators.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionRobotic Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesGastric MucosaHumansEndoscopic knifeEndoscopic submucosal dissectionRobotic endoscopic submucosal dissectionSteerable

Identifiers

PMID42270757
PMCPMC13500692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.