Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270720›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Mathematical analysis of photoreceptor changes in conditions of separation from the underlying retinal pigment epithelium.

Erika T Camacho, Miriam A Goldman, Lucia Gonzalez-Buendia, Daniel E Maidana, Demetrios G Vavvas, Stephen Wirkus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erika T CamachoDepartment of Mathematics, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Miriam A GoldmanBiomedical Informatics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lucia Gonzalez-BuendiaIMO Grupo Miranza, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel E MaidanaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Demetrios G VavvasDepartment of Ophthalmology Harvard Medical School, Mass Eye and Ear, Ines and Frederick Yeatts Retina Research Laboratory, Retina Service, Boston, MA, USA.
Stephen WirkusDepartment of Mathematics, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. stephen.wirkus@utsa.edu.

Funding

Necroptosis, neuroprotection and axonal regeneration in retina ganglion cell injuryR01EY025362 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI VAVVAS, DEMETRIOS · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
Defining the Role of Retinal Microglia and Infiltrating Monocytes on Photoreceptor Cell Death in Retinal DetachmentK08EY034935 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Daniel Enrique E. Maidana · 2023 to 2026
$850k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY034935NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025362NIH HHS K08EY034935NIH HHS R01EY025362Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoreceptors (PR) are responsible for absorbing and converting light into electrical signals necessary to create vision. To accomplish that, they are in an intimate relationship and attached to the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Separation of the PR from the underlying RPE is seen in many retina disorders and leads to PR cell death and subsequent vision loss. Separation of PR from the RPE (detachment) interferes with the normal phagocytosis and recycling of PR outer segments by the RPE, and disrupts nutrient and metabolite delivery, including glucose. All these factors contribute to cell dysfunction and eventual cell death. In this work, we sought to understand the importance of different factors in PR cell loss after detachment using mathematical modeling. We used known information of photoreceptor interactions in the healthy retina from the literature, and datasets for rod and cone degeneration after detachment. We also included three additional published datasets of PR cell death kinetics. A mathematical sensitivity analysis examined the impact of the parameters on the system over a detachment of 150 days and found that the parameters that significantly impact the rod and the cone population at the stages where "early intervention" happens (3-7 days after detachment) are not always the same ones that significantly impact the populations at 150 days. Additionally, some of the parameters negatively affected one population while having the opposite effect on the other. An increase in nutrient availability and efficiency of rod energy uptake were the only parameters that did not have a negative effect on either population. Similar results were obtained for reattachment. The interplay between these variables indicates that effective photoreceptor neuroprotection in retinal detachment may require multiple strategies. The prediction of these impactful parameters over time can be further assessed in experimental models and may provide guidance on the most effective ways to improve PR survival after their separation from RPE.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinal DetachmentRetinal Pigment EpitheliumRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsAnimalsCell DeathHumansPhagocytosisRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Degeneration

Identifiers

PMID42270720
PMCPMC13500501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.