Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270710›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparison of compressed sensing and conventional 4D flow MRI for turbulent kinetic energy assessment in healthy participants and patients with aortic stenosis.

Sungho Park, Jeong-Eun Yi, Ning Jin, Hojin Ha, Dongyeop Han, Su Ho Kim, Bae Young Lee, Alex J Barker, Hyungkyu Huh

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sungho Park *Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Medical Device Development Center, Daegu, 41061, South Korea.
Jeong-Eun Yi *Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Korea.
Ning JinCardiovascular MR R&D, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Hojin HaDepartment of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Medical Devices, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Dongyeop HanSiemens Healthineers Ltd, Seoul, South Korea.
Su Ho KimDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Bae Young LeeDepartment of Radiology, College of Medicine, Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Alex J BarkerDepartment of Radiology, Section of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA. alex.barker@cuanschutz.edu.
Hyungkyu HuhDaegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Medical Device Development Center, Daegu, 41061, South Korea. hkhuh@kmedihub.re.kr.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute RS-2025-02263007Korean Cardiac Research Foundation 202002-01Ministry of Education 2025-RISE-10-002Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2025-02653196Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning RS-2021-NR061225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) assessments using compressed sensing (CS)-accelerated three-dimensional time-resolved phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Conventional and CS 4D flow MRI (R = 2 with GRAPPA and R = 7.7 with CS, respectively) were sequentially acquired for voxel-wise comparison in healthy participants and patients. Total TKE was measured in both the ascending aorta (AAo) and the whole aortic region. The difference between GRAPPA and CS was expressed as the ratio of (CS 4D flow - Conventional 4D flow) to (Conventional 4D flow). A two-tailed paired t-test was used to assess statistical significance. In healthy participants, the maximum total TKE (TKE

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overAortaBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKineticsMaleMiddle Aged4D flow MRIAortic stenosisMagnetic resonance imagingTurbulent kinetic energy

Identifiers

PMID42270710
PMCPMC13500813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.