ArticleScientific reports2026
A new eucrocopodan archosauriform from the Middle Triassic of southern Brazil and the phylogeny of Euparkeriidae.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Archosauriformes comprise a diverse range of reptiles, including the crown-group Archosauria, which flourished during the Triassic Period. Early-diverging archosauriforms, such as proterosuchids and erythrosuchids, are becoming progressively well-known due to recent studies and consistently resolve at the base of the clade. More crownward, Eucrocopoda includes archosauriform taxa that increasingly approximate the ancestral archosaur body plan. Early-diverging eucrocopodan archosauriforms have a widespread paleogeographic record but remain poorly understood in terms of ingroup relationships. Within this radiation, Euparkeriidae is particularly challenging, because its ingroup composition and monophyly is debated, with some authors supporting a non-monospecific Euparkeriidae, whereas others fail to recover this hypothesis. The eponymous Euparkeria capensis is known from the Early to Middle Triassic of South Africa, whereas other putative euparkeriids are primarily known from the Early to Middle Triassic of China, Germany, Poland, and Russia. Here, we describe a new early-diverging eucrocopodan (Silescelida acristata gen. et sp. nov.) from the Middle Triassic of southern Brazil. Phylogenetic analyses incorporating this taxon suggest a possible placement within Euparkeriidae, though its position shows instability depending on the operational taxonomic units considered, especially among other putative euparkeriids. This discovery not only informs on the temporal and paleogeographic distribution of euparkeriids but also sheds light on the origin and early evolution of eucrocopodans, representing the first record of this archosauriform grade in the Triassic of Brazil. More broadly, the new taxon underscores the significance of South American Triassic deposits within the evolutionary history of archosauriforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.