Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42270694›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Federated continual learning for privacy-preserving chest radiograph classification.

Anay Sinhal, Amit Sinhal, Arpana Sinhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anay SinhalUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Amit SinhalJK Lakshmipat University, Jaipur, India.
Arpana SinhalManipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India. arpana.sinhal@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-site deep learning for chest radiographs runs into two problems that are usually treated separately: privacy regulations prevent hospitals from pooling raw images, and clinical workflows change over time in ways that cause sequential model updates to overwrite earlier knowledge. Federated learning addresses the first problem, but most FL systems are built for static data distributions. Federated continual learning (FCL) handles both, though the methods that perform best on benchmarks tend to require public surrogate datasets or stored image replay - neither of which is easy to justify in a hospital context. We propose DP-FedEPC (Differentially Private Federated Elastic Prototype Consolidation), which combines elastic weight consolidation (EWC), prototype-based rehearsal, and client-side DP-SGD within a standard FedAvg workflow. EWC keeps weight updates from drifting away from parameters learned on earlier tasks. A small bank of latent prototypes - not raw images - holds class geometry stable across task shifts. Every client trains under DP-SGD, and we report the achieved [Formula: see text] for each noise level explicitly (Table 7). We train on CheXpert and validate externally on MIMIC-CXR. Beyond macro-AUROC, we report per-finding performance and forgetting scores (Table 3), prototype geometry and failure cases (Figs. 2-4), and a full cost breakdown against baselines (Table 8).

Indexed as

PrivacyRadiography, ThoracicAlgorithmsDeep LearningFederated LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCatastrophic forgettingChest radiographsDifferential privacyElastic weight consolidationFederated continual learningFederated learningPrototype-based federated learningPrototype rehearsal

Identifiers

PMID42270694
PMCPMC13500843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.