ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Tandem occlusions after emergent stenting in acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective cohort study from a comprehensive stroke center's experience (TOESIS study).
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveIn acute tandem occlusion, emergent stenting has recently become an endovascular treatment option combined with mechanical thrombectomy to achieve recanalization. However, data on the beneficial endovascular management of tandem occlusion in two vascular territories remain limited. The purpose of this study was to compare improvements in clinical outcomes between two vascular territories 3 months after emergent stenting.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent emergent extracranial stenting at our hospital. The primary outcomes were the rate of favorable outcome at 3 months and the incidence of postprocedural hemorrhagic transformation.ResultsPosttreatment outcomes were evaluated in 145 eligible patients who underwent emergent extracranial stenting between December 2020 and June 2025. At 3 months postprocedure, 108 patients (74.5%) had favorable outcomes, of whom 97 (66.9%) achieved good outcomes. Smoking, dyslipidemia, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥12, diffusion-weighted imaging-Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score ≤6, and procedural complications (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with poor outcomes.ConclusionsIn summary, emergent stenting for tandem occlusions involving both vascular territories appears to be an essential recanalization method associated with improved clinical outcomes at the 3-month follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.