Metabolic and blood flow responses to single leg emphasis cycling compared to single and double leg cycling.

B Ryan Davis, Shane Aultman, Safwan Barnawi, Alex Sipolino, John McDaniel

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Metabolic and blood flow responses to single leg emphasis cycling compared to single and double leg cycling.Experimental physiology · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B Ryan DavisExercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0739-1879

Shane AultmanExercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1712-9424

Safwan BarnawiExercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8040-3640

Alex SipolinoExercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.

John McDanielExercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8571-881X

Funding

Health Communities Research Institute

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single leg emphasis cycling (SLEC) has the potential to be beneficial in the rehabilitation setting; however, the metabolic responses to it are unknown. Thus, the current investigation sought to evaluate the metabolic and blood flow responses of SLEC compared to traditional double leg cycling (DLC) and single leg cycling (SLC). This was a within-participant randomized controlled trial where 12 recreationally active participants completed three different cycling modalities (DLC, SLC and SLEC) at 20%, 35% and 50% of power associated with DLC

Indexed as

blood flowcarbohydrate oxidationsingle leg cyclingsmall muscle mass

Identifiers

PMID42270155

DOI10.1113/EP093250

PMCPMC13394664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.