SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Diagnostic performance and safety of image-guided pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUndiagnosed exudative pleural effusions often require pleural biopsy for a definitive diagnosis. The optimal sampling method, particularly when medical thoracoscopy is compared with image-guided pleural biopsy, remains uncertain.
methodsThis systematic review and network meta-analysis included studies that reported on the diagnostic performance and safety of medical thoracoscopy and image-guided pleural biopsy approaches. The primary outcome of this study was diagnostic yield, and the secondary outcomes included other diagnostic parameters (
resultsAn analysis of 64 studies involving 8744 patients revealed that rigid medical thoracoscopy had the highest diagnostic yield (95.0%), followed by cryobiopsy (93.1%), semirigid medical thoracoscopy (92.3%), and ultrasound elastography (UE)-guided biopsy (92.3%). Closed pleural biopsy had the lowest yield (75.1%). The current evidence is insufficient to establish the superiority of any biopsy method in terms of complications
conclusionClosed pleural biopsy consistently has a low diagnostic yield and is not recommended as a first-line biopsy method for patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions. Rigid medical thoracoscopy offers distinct clinical value for a complete visual inspection, large biopsies, and potential pleurodesis, particularly in suspected mesothelioma cases. The currently available evidence does not support the routine replacement of semirigid medical thoracoscopy with cryobiopsy. Computed tomography-guided biopsy may be preferred in cases involving thickening ≥10 mm or small target lesions. Conversely, ultrasound-guided biopsy may be appropriate for lesions measuring ≥3 mm with a clear acoustic window. UE-guided pleural biopsy shows promise as an emerging option, although the evidence is limited. In tuberculous pleurisy, medical thoracoscopy may offer higher diagnostic sensitivity in certain settings, particularly in high-prevalence areas. The current evidence is insufficient to establish a clear advantage for any biopsy method regarding the overall complication risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.