ArticleBMJ open2026
Information anxiety across populations in the VUCA era: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInformation anxiety (IA) describes the distress caused by the gap between the information individuals have and what they feel they should possess. In the current digital environment-marked by volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity-IA has expanded beyond traditional academic and workplace contexts to become a pervasive concern across populations. Mapping the empirical evidence on IA is critical to understanding its prevalence, determinants, impacts and coping strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will systematically search EBSCOhost, Scopus and Web of Science for peer-reviewed empirical studies published from 1 January 2000 to the planned end date of 5 November 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen records, with a third resolving discrepancies. Data extraction will be conducted using a customised tool, and results will be synthesised narratively and visually, structured around bibliometric characteristics, the Population, Concept, Context framework and a Stimulus-Organism-Response model. Subgroup analyses will be conducted across populations, disciplines and regions.-ScR ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study is based on secondary analysis of published data, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.