ArticleBMJ open2026
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of treatment options for depressive disorders in children and adolescents: protocol of a network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe incidence of depression among children and adolescents has been increasing in recent years, posing significant challenges to public health and clinical care. A variety of treatments, including pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy and physical interventions, are widely used in clinical practice. However, a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of all these treatment modalities is currently lacking. This study aims to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and acceptability of all available treatments for depression in children and adolescents, offering valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making and guide future research in this critical area. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include randomised controlled trials evaluating active interventions for depressive disorders in children and adolescents. Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from inception to 2 July 2024 and updated on 2 November 2025. Two of four investigators will independently screen studies, extract data from eligible articles and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. The primary outcome will be the change in depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes will include acceptability (all-cause discontinuation), response rate, remission rate and overall functioning. Pairwise and Bayesian NMA will be conducted. Small-study effects and publication bias will be assessed. The certainty of the evidence will be evaluated according to the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review involves secondary analysis of previously published studies, ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO-ID CRD42024557384.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.