ArticleBMJ open2026
Humanistic care in the ICU: effects on patient dignity, delirium and family satisfaction - a non-randomised clinical trial protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCritical care patients face varying degrees of physical and psychological stress; in recent decades, the increasing focus on technologies and clinical processes has led to dehumanisation. In contrast, humanistic care has been introduced as an essential care paradigm, emphasising comprehensive care and considering all stakeholders in the care process (patient, family and staff). In addition to improving clinical outcomes, this approach focuses on family satisfaction, preserving the human dignity of patients and reducing the incidence of acute cognitive disorders such as delirium; therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the impact of humanistic care on these three key areas in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This non-randomised clinical trial was performed in the ICU. There are two distinct groups (194 patients)-a control group that receives usual care and an intervention group that receives both usual care and a set of targeted interventions based on the seven components of the Humanising Intensive Care (HU-CI) model ('open-door ICU', 'communication', 'patient well-being', 'caring for professionals', 'post-ICU syndrome', 'end-of-life care' and 'humanised infrastructure') for three main groups including healthcare personnel, patients and their families. The primary outcome is delirium (Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit tool), and secondary outcomes are family satisfaction (Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Units Questionnaire) and human dignity (Patient Dignity Inventory). Finally, the data will be analysed through STATA V.18 software using the statistical methods of independent t-test or its non-parametrical equivalent, χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1404.086). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: IRCT registration number: IRCT20250727066651N1. Registration date: 30 July 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.