ArticleBMJ open2026
Study protocol for a pragmatic parallel-group randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of coaching with an online intervention, compared with the online intervention alone, for families of children who have experienced developmental regression.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDevelopmental regression is when children lose one or more skills they have established. Families caring for these children need timely recognition to assist diagnosis and tailored interventions. Families also need support to develop practical skills for caregiving and strategies to promote family well-being and community participation. Given the high caring demands, flexibly delivered approaches are needed to accommodate family routines. Online delivery of health-related interventions that provide coaching, information, or both has been found to be a feasible and effective option for families. Family Focus is a new family-centred online programme, co-designed with parents and family advocates, clinicians, and researchers to support and empower primary carers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a prospective, pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of online parent coaching plus Family Focus (Coaching+FF) to Family Focus alone (FF) for primary carers of children experiencing developmental regression. A sample of 56 families will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Outcomes are assessed at baseline, post-intervention and 12-month post-randomisation. The primary outcome is parental stress symptoms at post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include parental depressive and anxiety symptoms, parental engagement in health-promoting activities, family empowerment, family quality of life and child global health outcomes. The study will also examine the uptake and acceptability of specific coaching and FF components and explore the facilitators and barriers to their delivery and implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approvals were obtained from the participating organisations (Monash Health HREC/107806). Informed consent is obtained from parents/guardians of children prior to study enrolment. Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lived experience agencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN25513446.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.