ArticleBMJ open2026
Factors influencing data quality in electronic health records among health professionals in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionData quality in electronic health records (EHRs) is central to data-informed healthcare. Health professionals play a key role in ensuring data quality yet the complexities of clinical data practices remain poorly understood. Previous reviews have focused on specific documentation domains or professions, leaving a gap in understanding the broader individual, organisational, technological and contextual factors influencing data quality in hospital settings. This scoping review aims to identify and map factors that promote or hinder data quality in EHRs among health professionals in hospital settings. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Peer-reviewed studies will be identified through comprehensive searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data using the JBI Extraction Form. Data will be charted and mapped according to the six dimensions of the Digital Health Data Quality Dimension and Outcome (DQ-DO) framework-accuracy, completeness, consistency, contextual validity, currency and accessibility-and analysed across professional groups and hospital contexts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review as it is based on publicly available data. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and presentations at relevant academic and clinical conferences. REGISTRATION: The protocol has been registered in the Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YQ2DX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.