ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Perceived eye care risk and safety issues identified by optometrists in Scotland: a focus group study.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEvidence on the nature and scale of risk and safety concerns in optometry practice is very limited, especially compared with other primary care professions. In Scotland, many changes occurred in the profession during and because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The theme of risk and patient safety was, therefore, chosen as the priority focus for the 2022 mandatory national training programme, which optometrists providing General Ophthalmic Services in Scotland are required to undertake.
aimTo explore and identify perceived current and future safety risks and how these might be mitigated in relation to professional optometry practice in Scotland.
methodsStudy participants were all registered General Optical Council members from nine of the 14 regional health boards in Scotland. Data were collected via three online focus groups over a 2-month period during 2021 with each comprising six to eight participants. Data were transcribed with permission and then subjected to a basic thematic analysis.
results16 optometrists participated in the study. Six principal themes were generated from the data analysis: (1) current overview and context (eg, perceived increased risk); (2) competency risks (eg, skills and knowledge to manage disease); (3) conduct risks (eg, behaviours of practitioners); (4) contextual risks (eg, environmental issues); (5) future risks (eg, technology) and (6) risk mitigations (eg, education and training).
conclusionsOptometrists participating in this study expressed concerns that the level of perceived clinical risk in the Optometry profession is increasing, mainly related to technology, scope of practice, role development and changes in consumer demand. Multiple recommendations are made to minimise reported risks including education for new roles; increased focus on improving care quality; support to those involved in safety incidents and complaints; taking a systems approach to areas of high risk and sharing good practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.