ReviewContact dermatitis2026
Patch Testing in Paediatric Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.
Review in Contact dermatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are common in children and are diagnostically challenging, with cutaneous manifestations being the most common presentation. Patch testing (PT) is a well-established tool for investigating delayed T-cell-mediated reactions and is widely used in patients with contact dermatitis. However, its role in paediatric DHRs remains unclear. Available data indicate that PT is safe and particularly useful when drug provocation testing is contraindicated, such as in patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions. However, diagnostic yield varies considerably among drug classes and clinical phenotypes. Sensitivity is generally low for beta-lactam and most non-beta-lactam antibiotics, which limits their standalone value in common exanthematous reactions. Higher positivity rates have been reported for antiepileptic drugs, and PT may help identify the culprit drug and assess its cross-reactivity. However, evidence supporting the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol remains scarce. Methodological heterogeneity and limited paediatric-specific data further constrain this interpretation. Overall, PT should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool integrated with clinical history and other tests, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and prospective paediatric studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.