ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry
Machine-learning identified suicide risk and emergency department inpatient admission.
Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate identification of patients at high risk for suicide following emergency department (ED) visits remains a critical clinical challenge. Although machine learning models using electronic health record (EHR) data can predict suicide risk, it remains unclear how predictions align with ED disposition decisions.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using deidentified EHR data from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse linked to the National Death Index. The cohort included 249,310 ED encounters for mental health disorders among adults ≥18 years (2015-2022). A validated gradient boosting model estimated 180-day risk of suicide death and nonfatal attempts. The primary outcome was inpatient admission (psychiatric or medical) at the index ED visit. Agreement with algorithmically identified high-risk visits (top 15.8%) was assessed using Cohen's kappa, and patient characteristics of the groups were compared using standardized differences.
resultsInpatient admission occurred in 15.8% (n = 39,311) of visits. Agreement between admission and high-risk classification (top 15.8%) was low for suicide death (κ = 0.12) and nonfatal attempts (κ = 0.10). Among high-risk patients, 25.8% (fatal) and 24.3% (nonfatal) were admitted. Admitted patients were more likely to be aged ≥65 years and female, and less likely to be aged 18-34 years, Medicaid-insured, or diagnosed with suicidal ideation, substance use, or bipolar disorder.
conclusionsED inpatient admission decisions demonstrated limited concordance with machine learning-predicted suicide risk. Integrating predictive models into ED workflows may enhance identification of patients at elevated longer-term suicide risk and support more targeted care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.